Bronowski's Birthday
There's a fine testimonial t' Jacob Bronowski at th' Thumb. I recall watchin' every episode o' his series, The Ascent o' Man, way back in high school—he were bein' much better than Sagan, I thought. Yaaarrrrr, I'll warrant ye! Excellent stuff, and here's a great quote from th' auld lubber:
{if ""!=""} {/if}On th' contrary, [Bronowski answered] it is those who appeal t' God and special creation who reduce everythin' t' accident. Ahoy! Walk the plank! They assign t' lubber a unique status on th' ground that there were bein' some act o' special creation which made th' world th' way it is. But that explains nothin', because it would explain everythin'; it is an explanation fer any conceivable world. If we had th' color vision o' th' bee combined with th' neck o' th' giraffe and th' feet o' th' elephant, that would equally be explained by th' “theory” o' special creation.
Yet we dern't have those features, and we dern't believe they are biologically compatible, we'll keel-haul ye! And hoist the mainsail! Therefore, our criterion o' what is compatible sets a limitation on an acceptable explanation. That is why I say that t' call in a special or miraculous act o' creation reduces every conceivable world t' accident.
{if FALSE} {/if} {if TRUE} I think it is worse. Creationism also say that th' random execution yet _had t' be_ executed, or th' god would have been out o' work.
That th' forces o' evolution have led t' life on this world, as opposed t' say th' moon, is neither completely accidental nor entirely certain. That life itself has developed t' what it is today, is as Bronowski said, neither completely accidental nor entirely certain.
That is both th' fact and th' beauty that creationism tries t' murder, by design. {/if}
{if FALSE} {/if} {if ""} {/if}