PZ Myers. 2005 Dec 20. They can quantify that?. <http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/they_can_quantify_that/>. Accessed 2006 Feb 13.

Posted on M00o93H7pQ09L8X1t49cHY01Z5j4TT91fGfr on Tuesday, December 20, 2005

They can quantify that?

I'm sluttier than Majikthise: 25.31% vs. 6.02%. Sean reports that Cosmic Variance has a negative slut value, which prompts me to say this about physicists: NERDS!!!!.

Posted by PZ Myers on 12/20 at 05:52 PM
Weirdness • 0 Trackbacks • Other weblogs • Permalink
  1. Squid smut shouldn't count...
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  05:59 PM
  2. Slut!
    #: Posted by Sean  on  12/20  at  06:10 PM
  3. Some people who have you beat:

    Jessica Simpson: 96.74%
    Brittany Spears: 85.34%
    Jenna Bush: 61.81%
    Barry White: 60.57%
    Christina Aguilera: 46.15%
    Courtney Love: 40.44% (That can't be right!)
    David Hasselhoff: 40%

    You are sluttier than Ben Affleck, though, at 22.9%.
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  06:17 PM
  4. I think it's malfunctioning because I got a 49.42!
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  06:19 PM
  5. Alon Levy is 1.01% slutty; http://www.brentrasmussen.com is 17.89% slutty; and brentrasmussen.com is 10.7% slutty.
    #: Posted by Alon Levy  on  12/20  at  06:54 PM
  6. 25.77% (150 / 582), a tad sluttier than you. I used the URL, though. The word 'coturnix' clocks at only 7.47%, which is still sluttier than Lindsay!
    #: Posted by coturnix  on  12/20  at  07:03 PM
  7. that thing about physicists (and engineers) is probably right: my ekzept.net got:
    Promiscuity: 1.33% (1 / 75)
    #: Posted by ekzept  on  12/20  at  07:05 PM
  8. Wait, I feel an incoming insult... There! As an exphysicist I must of course immediately reject that piece of unjustified statement.

    First off, physicists, unlike biologists, can actually use negative values. Second, negative slut-values means that Google lies. You can use a lie to justify anything much as a division of zero means that you can prove anything.

    Oh, er... that was a couple of nerdy things to say. Darn! So I will jump directly to the finish. As any biologist should know, individual intelligence correlates strongly with sex drive in humans. So comparatively, physicists are just as needy grin as biologists. Plus they have the advantage of appreciating beautiful curves whereever they are to be found.

    So there!
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  07:07 PM
  9. Just for fun:

    Discovery Institute- 1.68%
    Michael Behe- 3.38%
    Intelligent Design 3.3%
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  07:14 PM
  10. Ooops... I acidentally read my own post (I usually refrain, since I seem to have read identical stuff earlier) and nerdspotted an error: it should be 'division _by_ zero', of course.

    "Must watch those prepositions, they are small and easily misplaced. Must watch those ..."
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  07:55 PM
  11. Holy crap! Pat Robertson dot com has a sluttiness factor of -84.67! He really needs to get laid.
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  08:42 PM
  12. If it makes anyone feel any better about themselves, my url scored just below Jessica Simpson at 93.98%

    What's in a name anyway?
    #: Posted by IAMB  on  12/20  at  09:25 PM
  13. Holy crap. I am sluttier than Jessica Simpson by a full percentage point.

    I must say "fuck" a lot! Should I be happy or sad about this?
    #: Posted by The Chemist  on  12/20  at  09:56 PM
  14. Oh, and I'm a physical chemist by the way. So I am a nerd, but I'm an obscene nerd.
    #: Posted by The Chemist  on  12/20  at  09:59 PM
  15. Rah! My own (group) blog scored 96.75%

    And we're a bunch of (mostly, anyway) geeks -- I'm so proud!
    #: Posted by Merg  on  12/20  at  10:02 PM
  16. 62.05% (154500 / 249000)
    morris.umn.edu

    50% (1070000 / 2140000)
    uidaho.edu

    13.23% (9700 / 73300)
    discovery.org

    6.87% (180000 / 2620000)
    uoregon.edu

    -2.8% (-300000 / 10700000)
    whitehouse.gov

    21.13% (22400 / 106000)
    rnc.org

    What does it all mean when pharyngula is less slutty than so many venerable public institution, unvenerable institutions, but more slutty than the whore at the DI?

    I think it means we are having more fun!!!!!!!!!!!

    So much for ignorance being bliss.
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  10:07 PM
  17. -1927.23% (-127390 / 6610)
    convolutedwoolymuffins.com

    I don't even know what that means...
    #: Posted by Martha  on  12/20  at  10:20 PM
  18. -52352.83% (-41620500 / 79500)

    slut.com

    rasberry
    #: Posted by  on  12/20  at  10:45 PM
  19. Hey, Pharyngula debunks garbage - garbage which is slutty and pimps deities. Combine this with invertebrate sex/porn and it's unsurprising the "slutometer" hits the roof!
    #: Posted by  on  12/21  at  12:00 AM
  20. I got negative eighty-two. Negative eighty-two.

    I'm not even sure that's physically possible.
    #: Posted by  on  12/21  at  12:27 AM
  21. Hey! I'm married to a physicist you know. They may be nerds but they're darn cute nerds.

    MKK
    #: Posted by Mary Kay  on  12/21  at  12:35 AM
  22. Just to point out... You seem to be a whole lot more promiscuous if you use a domain suffix like .com or .org.

    Just Pharyngula by itself gives a rating of only 5.18%

    Sorry PZ. Guess you're a little more family friendly that you hoped.
    #: Posted by Ocellated  on  12/21  at  12:43 AM
  23. I must be the least slutty person here: -87.39%! Oh my god, the embarrassment, I'll never live it down...
    #: Posted by No More Mr. Nice Guy!  on  12/21  at  12:43 AM
  24. Hmm. Odd - dmanisi.org (which so far I use only for the odd email) gets 11.78% and outeast.net (which is only parked) gets a full 100% slut rating. While I may personally warrant the latter score I'm not wholly convinced that this system is entirely reliable.
    #: Posted by  on  12/21  at  02:18 AM
  25. evolution
    Promiscuity: 0.49% (1000000 / 205000000)

    creationism
    Promiscuity: 5.14% (190000 / 3700000)

    Owned pl0x

    Oh and a plug for us TE's

    theisitic evolution
    Promiscuity: 0% (0 / 96)
    Apparently belief isn't popular enough to be slutty... maybe I can get the guys from ICR or DI to slut me up a little =D

    In other news, my Girlfriend is -1.04% slutty. =D I, on the other hand, and over 7.14% (making me over 3 times as slutty as PZ)
    #: Posted by  on  12/21  at  09:11 AM
  26. Its results look dubious.

    Score for my blog: 34.24% (so I'm sluttier than you)
    realadultsex.com: 85.5% (so far, so good)
    nakedwriting.com: 96.5% (no way is nakedwriting.com sluttier than realadultsex.com)
    susiebright.blogs.com: 50.64% (wow, how did Susie Bright manage to score that low?)
    Susie Bright: 19.44% (and she's practically virginal if I give it her name rather than her blog URL)
    amywelborn.typepad.com: 38.4% (this is a nice traditional Catholic blog, and it scores sluttier than you or me)
    On the other hand, conservative columnist Maggie Gallagher is utterly virginal: 2.95%
    #: Posted by Lynn Gazis-Sax  on  12/21  at  09:43 AM
  27. Hm, I need a domain name to use this well, I guess.
    #: Posted by Keith Douglas  on  12/21  at  10:06 AM
  28. My URL got 42.72. Looks like oosiks count for more than squid sex.
    #: Posted by John McKay  on  12/21  at  02:59 PM
  29. 57% Squidslut.
    #: Posted by Blogtopus  on  12/22  at  01:19 AM
  30. *Raises hand*

    -66.2% slut here.

    Why yes, I am a physicist. How'd you guess...
    #: Posted by dtl  on  12/22  at  06:05 AM